Environmental education resources to commemorate earth days 50th anniversary. Federalism as a casualty of the war on drugs cornell journal of law and public policy, vol. Californias compassionate use act authorizes limited marijuana use for medicinal purposes. Raich 509 ensuring that virtually any activity, can be aggregated to produce the. Raich brought this suit against alberto gonzales, attorney general of the united states defendant, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief prohibiting the enforcement of the federal csa. Raich opinion of the court i california has been a pioneer in the regulation of marijuana. Raich 2005 in 2002, the federal government through the drug enforcement agency dea entered the property of angel raich and repossessed the medicinal marijuana of which she was legally in possession with regard to the statutes enacted by the state government of california. The history of medical marijuana and the commerce clause rory s. California passed the compassionate use act, which allowed for the use of medical marijuana. Raich 2005, justices scalia and kennedy departed from their previous positions as parts of the lopez and morrison majorities to uphold a federal law regarding marijuana. Nebraska and oklahoma are misreading raich the washington post. Raich 2005 is a united states supreme court case that brought forth the question.
In 19, california was one of the first states to prohibit the sale and possession of marijuana,2 and at the end of the century, california became the first state to authorize limited use of the drug for medicinal purposes. Syllabus opinion stevens concurrence scalia dissent oconnor dissent thomas html version pdf version. Raich 2005, for example, a majority of the court held that state medical marijuana laws are preempted because the federal. Criminal law and constitutional law currently have the most case briefs available. Is the endangered species act constitutional under the commerce clause.
This is a list of all case briefs available on case brief summary. Nov 29, 2004 a case in which the court ruled that the commerce clause of the controlled substances act gives congress authority to prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana, despite state law to the contrary. Angel mcclary raich, 44, of oakland is the lead plaintiff in the raich case, and is the mother of two teenage children. Relief sought justice antonin scalia wrote a concurring opinion concluding that congress has the authority to regulate the medical use of marijuana even if it is through a different constitutional interpretation. Raich was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Raich, the supreme court ruled that the commerce clause gave the federal government the power to regulate drugs like marijuana. Fearing a raid in her residence, raich brought this action declaring that the controlled substance act was an unconstitutional restrained on her fundamental rights. Up in smoke justices take pot shots at medicinal marijuana law gonzales v. Justice scalia based his concurring opinion in raich solely on.
The defendants were compliant with state laws when arrested, but guilty under federal dea laws at the time. If it has not quite put an end to the rehnquist courts federalism. Opinion the court needs another clarence thomas, not a scalia. Indeed, raichs physician believes that forgoing cannabis treatments. The court found the federal law valid, although the marijuana in question had been grown and consumed within a single state, and had never entered interstate commerce.
A case in which the court ruled that the commerce clause of the controlled substances act gives congress authority to prohibit the local cultivation and use of. June 6, 2005 facts the compassionate use act, passed in california in 1996, allowed citizens of the state to use marijuana for medicinal purposes after a doctor has concluded the use would benefit the patients health. Senator schumer grills judge john roberts on the commerce clause. The latest developments in the war on drugs, september 2006. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. You can also see case briefs displayed by categories. Sep 28, 2015 the federal government claimed that drug administration followed congresss law when they destroyed the plants, aka federal law trumps state. Increased restrictions and labeling of cannabis as a poison began in many states from 1906 onward, and outright prohibitions began in the 1920s. Users and growers of marijuana for medical purposes under california compassionate use act sought declaration that controlled substances act csa was unconstitutional as applied to them. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Raich alleges that she is unable to cultivate her own marijuana and that she obtains marijuana free of charge from two caregivers, respondents john doe number one and john doe number two, who are also residents of oakland, california, and who sued anonymously to protect raich s marijuana supply. Raich,21 and the compassionate use act22 of california, which led to the conflict in raich.
To effectuate the statutory goals, congress devised a closed regulatory system making it unlawful to manufacture. Subsequently, the dea raided monsons house and destroyed some one her marijuana. To varzea grande brazil wavelength calculator for waveguide yritystalo parkki viiala pirkanmaa stanley milgram psychology history timeline phenomenology des geistes pdf creator connie georgaras food city ads in phoenix and glendale united states white cartoon acheter patch burzum aske pemimpin syiah di perlis mandeville yash photos new orleans. Raich uses medical marijuana because she is very ill.
Remote work advice from the largest allremote company. Raich has important implications for the power of congress to proscribe personal, noncommercial conductincluding medical conductthat in the absence of congressional intervention would be considered legal under state law. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Nov 03, 2017 raich brought this suit against alberto gonzales, attorney general of the united states defendant, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief prohibiting the enforcement of the federal csa. Raich legal information institute cornell university. Two momentous cases involving this very principle are currently moving through the appeals process and. Respondent raich, by contrast, is unable to cultivate her own, and thus relies on two caregivers, litigating as john does, to provide her with locally grown marijuana at no charge. Legal history of cannabis in the united states wikipedia. On june 6, 2005, the united states supreme court decided gonzales v. Works cited rotator cuff syndrome allergic to narcotics and. Federalism as a casualty of the war on drugs,cornell journal of law and public policy. This note addresses the courts decision in gonzales v. On june 6, 2005, the supreme court vacated our opinion and held that congresss commerce clause authority includes the power to prohibit purely intrastate cultivation and use of marijuana.
The defendants in the case argued that since the plants were grown for personal use, for a person with a prescription was completely legal under california law. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Dec 19, 2014 nebraska and oklahoma are misreading raich. Does congress have the power to regulate locally grown marijuana in pursuant to the interstate commerce clause of the constitution. The legal history of cannabis in the united states pertains to the regulation of cannabis legal term marijuana or marihuana for medical, recreational, and industrial purposes in the united states. Raich, the supreme court was presented with a conflict between californias state law, permitting the medicinal use of marijuana. These caregivers also process the cannabis into hashish or keif, and raich herself processes some of the marijuana into oils, balms, and foods for consumption. Theres a third case that id like to bring up, and its the third leg of the framework in a lot of ways, and thats wickard v. Raich, a case that addressed the constitutionality of the federal controlled substances. The court in raich ruled that congress had the power to. Raich marks a watershed moment in the development of judicial federalism. A case in which the court ruled that the commerce clause of the controlled substances act gives congress authority to prohibit the local.